It does not respond to a yes or no answer. I will tell the gentleman why, because the Congressional Budget Office said this has no budgetary consequence. It is an intergovernmental transfer. The gentleman's argument is they are saving the Social Security trust fund by shipping off, according to the Treasury's recommendation, an amount equal to the Social Security surplus to New York City to a Federal Reserve Bank, and that they are lockboxing, saving Social Security, removing the money so it cannot be spent and sending it to New York City. And the Congressional Budget Office, the agency we use to determine the costs of these actions, says there is no cost. There is no cost because it is an intergovernmental transfer. This is hogwash, vote no.
David Thomas: “It does not respond to a yes or no answer. I will tell the gentleman why, because the Congressional Budget Office said…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of a financial transfer related to the Social Security trust fund.
Share
More from David Thomas
it is now my pleasure to provide 3 minutes in support of H.R. 5638, the compromise that is endorsed by the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, the United States Chamber of Commerce, the majority…
I rise today regarding the introduction of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2007. This legislation will reauthorize the Indian Health Care Improvement Act and provide essential improvements to the Indian health system…
speaker after speaker after speaker on the other side of the aisle went in the well. What was the common plea? Give us a clean vote on minimum wage. Just give us a clean vote on minimum wage. You have got 169 pages here. They wrote it…
The amendment will bring transparency and discipline, but not order, to this budget process. The budget resolution is supposed to provide a blueprint for Government spending and allocate dollars for appropriators to spend in particular…





