Political Quotes

David Thomas: Here is one in behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce favoring the competitive sourcing and opposing the amendment. Here…

On the recordSeptember 23, 2003
Here is one in behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce favoring the competitive sourcing and opposing the amendment. Here is the NFIB, the National Federation of Independent Businesses, which opposes the amendment. Citizens Against Government Waste is also in support of this. American Council of Engineering Companies, the National Taxpayers Union, and Americans for Tax Reform--all of these are in strong support of continuing to give the private sector an opportunity in these areas. I also finally would like to tell you there is a statement of administration policy here in which the administration indicates they will veto a bill that includes this kind of program. They say the administration understands the amendment will be offered on the Senate floor which would effectively shut down the administration's competitive sourcing initiative to fundamentally improve the performance of government in many commercial activities. The administration seeks to improve performance of Government services based on the comprehensive principle of competition, a proven way of protecting taxpayer dollars while providing better services and performance. Now is the wrong time to short circuit the implementation of this principle, especially since numerous agencies are starting to make real progress in providing public/private competition. If the final version of the bill contains such a provision, the President's senior advisers would recommend he veto the bill.
Said by
David Thomas
New York

Editor's note · Context

Discussing competitive sourcing and opposition to an amendment during a floor speech.

Share

More from David Thomas

Nov 13, 2006

Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5602 was a bill that was introduced in June of this year by the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Ramstad) and principally the gentleman from California (Mr. Thompson). This is the culmination of a long and sometimes very…

govinfo.gov
Jun 22, 2006

Yes. The offer of the motion to recommit would have been exhausted, and I would simply say if that is not the case, they could offer another 10 partisan tracts on the argument that it is a motion to recommit, make the same arguments, and…

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2006

speaker after speaker after speaker on the other side of the aisle went in the well. What was the common plea? Give us a clean vote on minimum wage. Just give us a clean vote on minimum wage. You have got 169 pages here. They wrote it…

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2006

I yield myself briefly. Gee, I know you work for the minimum wage, and I know you want a higher minimum wage, but the way the offer was packaged was such that I had to vote ``no.'' So don't blame me that you didn't get an increase in the…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation