I rise also to talk about the dilemma that we are in. I agree with the Senator from Vermont and the Senator from Maryland that we ought not to be where we are. I believe it is time that we come to an agreement on the balanced budget. If you really want to come to a solution, you could have come to a solution by now--all of us. If you want to find a solution, you can find a solution. You cannot just continue to talk and say we have had useful conversations and walk away, having made no decisions. That is not a way. I have a little different view, however, of some of the reasons that we are here than the Senator from Maryland. The President could have signed the appropriations bills. He could have had those people back to work. He chose not to do that. We started on November 14, I believe, with an agreement to find a balanced budget in 7 years, using CBO numbers. And that was not done. On the part of the administration, nor indeed the other side of the aisle, a process to do that was not forthcoming. So, I think we should not be where we are. I have been here since Thursday, hoping the leadership would come forward and say, ``Here is a way to put people back to work.'' I have been here each of those days to do that. We have had objections from the other side of the aisle not to do that. ``We do not want to do that.'' So that is where we are, and we ought to change that.
David Thomas: “I rise also to talk about the dilemma that we are in. I agree with the Senator from Vermont and the Senator from…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a balanced budget and the lack of progress in negotiations.
Share
More from David Thomas
under the rule in consideration of this bill, the minority was allowed a motion to recommit. A motion to recommit was offered. It was clearly on its face nongermane. The Chair has just ruled that that so-called motion to recommit was…
Yes. The offer of the motion to recommit would have been exhausted, and I would simply say if that is not the case, they could offer another 10 partisan tracts on the argument that it is a motion to recommit, make the same arguments, and…
I think this is certainly one of the most important bills we have had before us and one, frankly, that is the most time-constrained of any we have had before us. Normally, we have a good deal of time to talk about bills and we have budget…
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…





