Yes, of course. Let me give you an example. The Senator has been here for 20 years, or whatever, and we have not balanced the budget in the time the Senator has been here. The Senator points to some areas--I do not mean this personally--but this has not been done. The Senator points to some possibilities that might happen under a constitutional amendment. Look at what has happened without one. So I say to the Senator that--he talks about a sham. The sham is that we have gone on for 25 years here and we have spent more than we have taken in. Every time we talk about it, everyone who gets up in this place says, ``I'm for balancing the budget. I'm going to balance the budget.'' What is the evidence? The evidence is you have not.
David Thomas: “Yes, of course. Let me give you an example. The Senator has been here for 20 years, or whatever, and we have not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the failure to balance the federal budget during a debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
This legislation is, in essence, a modest effort to provide the structure and resources necessary for citizens, schools, communities and others to undertake projects in the actual locales in which the so-called internment camps were…
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
In many ways, through my foundation, my last mission is to bring awareness to IAWL and those who are suffering.
I began to uncover the research and studies on Iraq Afghanistan War Lung disease, and the devastating effects of the 'burn pits' on service members and civilians.





