Yes, of course. Let me give you an example. The Senator has been here for 20 years, or whatever, and we have not balanced the budget in the time the Senator has been here. The Senator points to some areas--I do not mean this personally--but this has not been done. The Senator points to some possibilities that might happen under a constitutional amendment. Look at what has happened without one. So I say to the Senator that--he talks about a sham. The sham is that we have gone on for 25 years here and we have spent more than we have taken in. Every time we talk about it, everyone who gets up in this place says, ``I'm for balancing the budget. I'm going to balance the budget.'' What is the evidence? The evidence is you have not.
David Thomas: “Yes, of course. Let me give you an example. The Senator has been here for 20 years, or whatever, and we have not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the failure to balance the federal budget during a debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
speaker after speaker after speaker on the other side of the aisle went in the well. What was the common plea? Give us a clean vote on minimum wage. Just give us a clean vote on minimum wage. You have got 169 pages here. They wrote it…
In many ways, through my foundation, my last mission is to bring awareness to IAWL and those who are suffering.
I ask unanimous cosent that the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on Tuesday, September 5, 2006, at 4:15 p.m. to hold a hearing on nominations. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection…
I have a point of order. Beginning your statement with ``this is why it is germane'' is not addressing the germaneness question. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman must address his comments to the issue of germaneness of the motion to…





