I hope you all enjoyed that ride through very dark woods. Now let me explain what is really going on. Return with me to 1945. We were in the middle of a war and a decision was made which affects us profoundly today. There was a choice of increasing wages or there was an idea that we can snooker workers not to ask for more wages if we create a procedure in which employers offer fringe benefits for which they will get a tax break. Today, a dollar in wages competes against a dollar in fringe benefits. A dollar in wages is taxed 100 percent. A dollar in fringe benefits does not affect the worker or the employer. We created a system that puts a premium on going for fringe benefits over wages. The argument the gentleman from California just made is based on that concept. He has a letter from Joint Tax that says if you create this fringe benefit, flexible spending accounts, in which up to $500 of the employee's tax deferred structure is allowed to roll over in the employee-controlled structure as an incentive to keep down the fringe benefit costs, there is a possibility that these will be successful. What happens if they are successful? The dollar in wages is not paid, the dollar in fringe benefits is paid, and the payroll tax, which otherwise would have gone into the Social Security Trust Fund from the wages foregone, is what he is talking about; not enough to modify the trust fund one iota over the year in terms of true impact on the Social Security Trust Fund.
David Thomas: “I hope you all enjoyed that ride through very dark woods. Now let me explain what is really going on. Return with me to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of wage versus fringe benefit policies on the Social Security Trust Fund.
Share
More from David Thomas
I rise today to join in the conversation and the discussion about energy and in support of S. 3711, the Gulf of Mexico Energy bill. We are coming up on the anniversary of the Energy Policy Act which we passed sometime back. It is…
I would like to yield 20 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran), and I ask unanimous consent that he be allowed to control the 20 minutes. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from…
I ask unanimous cosent that the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on Tuesday, September 5, 2006, at 4:15 p.m. to hold a hearing on nominations. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection…
as sponsor of this bill, I support continuing to help the thousands of Americans fleeing the hostilities in Lebanon and returning to the safe confines of the United States. As of Sunday, July 23, 20 flights had rescued 3,890 U.S. citizens…





