I am pleased the conference report contains section 3154, which requires the Department of Energy [DOE] to carry out a study to determine the extent and valuation of natural resource damages at DOE sites. I authored this provision as chairman of the Senate Energy Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight. Frankly, I was shocked to find that the Department had not yet done their own study of this potentially huge future liability, and that is why I introduced this amendment. It is vital that the Department of Energy obtain comprehensive and accurate information regarding the extent and valuation of natural resource damages at DOE sites. This is especially important if we are to make realistic budget assumptions today and set realistic budget goals for the future. Unfortunately, there has not been a reliable study done on this issue to date. During the course of Superfund hearings held in the Environment and Public Works Committee, significant questions have been raised about the Department of Energy's liability for natural resource damages at their Superfund sites. Department officials first estimated liability in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Since that time, GAO has looked at the situation, as has CEQ. However, the CEQ and GAO estimates are quite different. GAO estimates a high range of $15 billion while CEQ says the high range is $500 million. The disparity between these two studies is troubling, as is the fact that DOE has never done their own study.
David Thomas: “I am pleased the conference report contains section 3154, which requires the Department of Energy [DOE] to carry out a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a study on natural resource damages at Department of Energy sites.
Share
More from David Thomas
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…
very briefly, no one would argue there are activities which are inherently governmental and should be performed by the Government. However, the Government should not engage in activities which are already offered in the private sector. I…
I yield myself briefly. Gee, I know you work for the minimum wage, and I know you want a higher minimum wage, but the way the offer was packaged was such that I had to vote ``no.'' So don't blame me that you didn't get an increase in the…
I also want to be on record as being opposed to a theocracy. And I will tell you that today, shortly, democracy will be demonstrated when the House of Representatives determines whether or not it sends this compromise measure over to the…





