I am concerned that some amendments adopted by Unanimous Consent may have a negative impact on the President's Competitive Sourcing Initiative, and ultimately adversely impact the President's ability to administer the bureaucracy of the Department of Defense. As a longtime supporter of a more accountable and responsible federal government, I strongly support President Bush's competitive sourcing initiative which seeks to improve the way federal agencies operate. However, I recognize how critical it is in these times of war that we move this bill quickly and not allow it to be held up further by partisan politics. Every president for the last 50 years, Republican and Democrat alike, has endorsed the elimination of commercial functions in the federal workforce, but their plans were not vigorously implemented or enforced. As a result, nearly half of today's civilian federal workforce is doing work that could be done more efficiently by the private sector.
David Thomas: “I am concerned that some amendments adopted by Unanimous Consent may have a negative impact on the President's…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about amendments affecting the President's Competitive Sourcing Initiative in a Defense bill.
Share
More from David Thomas
I think this is certainly one of the most important bills we have had before us and one, frankly, that is the most time-constrained of any we have had before us. Normally, we have a good deal of time to talk about bills and we have budget…
I also want to be on record as being opposed to a theocracy. And I will tell you that today, shortly, democracy will be demonstrated when the House of Representatives determines whether or not it sends this compromise measure over to the…
on behalf of Mr. Costa, Mr. Nunes and myself, I would like to advise the House that this past week an individual passed away, a former Member of the House of Representatives. Some of you didn't have the privilege of knowing him in person…
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…





