I cannot think, frankly, of anyone in the whole country who has had more experience in this than the people on the west coast connected to the California project. This bill has come to the Senate without the committee being involved. This very bill was passed by the committee last year with no objection from the Senator from New Mexico. That is a procedural question we have discussed quite a bit. Now I will discuss some of the objections. There are two points of view, very clearly. The Senator from Oregon said it very well: To whom are you going to look? I have been involved in this business in the past. The people in the business, the people who are responsible in your State, the people who have joined together in a region, have a much better view than bringing it back to the beltway for these decisions. However, in the current underlying bill, practically anyone can go to FERC. The bill we are discussing gives FERC responsibility to defer to other organizations. FERC need not defer to anyone on anything if they choose not to.
David Thomas: “I cannot think, frankly, of anyone in the whole country who has had more experience in this than the people on the west…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the California project and the involvement of FERC in Senate floor debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
reclaiming my time, millions of Americans are thankful they now have prescription drugs at significant savings. I know it is difficult because another line went through one of your typical political arguments. Test us. See if we are just…
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
I wish to speak in general about the bill, not on the specific amendments, about what I think we are doing and the importance, frankly, of what we are doing. We are talking, of course, about ethics, about how we function within this body…
I think this is a very equitable and timely distribution of these funds. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.





