Since the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Watson) wants me to explain the reference about cesspools referred to by me, I referred to it as a cesspool of red ink. And if anybody does not believe $24 billion of State government mismanagement is not a red ink cesspool, then I do not know what you would call it.
Addressing state government mismanagement during a discussion.
Share
More from David Thomas
I certainly agree it would be a mistake to send any message that we are not in support of our troops and, indeed, that is what voting on one message would do. Certainly, there are different views in the Senate and legitimately so. We…
I rise in support of democracy and in opposition to aristocracy, and simply and humbly request I have the same clock that was just used. How much time do I have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California is…
I wish to speak in general about the bill, not on the specific amendments, about what I think we are doing and the importance, frankly, of what we are doing. We are talking, of course, about ethics, about how we function within this body…
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…
Other voices in this conversation
