Either he was voting to protect the incomes of the very rich in Massachusetts or he exercised a futile procedure. There were four Members of his party who voted no. He had an opportunity, if he believed it was not real to vote no. He voted yes. The problem is they always want it both ways. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from Pennsylvania (Ms. Hart), a member of the committee.
David Thomas: “Either he was voting to protect the incomes of the very rich in Massachusetts or he exercised a futile procedure. There…”
Share
More from David Thomas
Speaker after speaker after speaker on the other side of the aisle went in the well. What was the common plea? Give us a clean vote on minimum wage. Just give us a clean vote on minimum wage. You have got 169 pages here. They wrote it…
In many ways, through my foundation, my last mission is to bring awareness to IAWL and those who are suffering.
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
This legislation is, in essence, a modest effort to provide the structure and resources necessary for citizens, schools, communities and others to undertake projects in the actual locales in which the so-called internment camps were…





