Mr. Speaker, we began this process on January 4 and we moved the legislation to the Senate. We are considering today, on January 17, Senate bill 2, the Senate version of this legislation. There will be no conference committee. This legislation will move directly to the President. The President has said that he will sign it into law. This process has taken 2 weeks. For people to fully understand the impact or maybe I should say the weight of today's decision, this is simply the text of the laws, without any annotation or explanation, that are now going to be applied to the Congress that are already applied to the private sector. I would tell my colleagues that S. 2 passed in the Senate 89 to 1. I believe the House should do the Senate one better. I would ask that the House pass S. 2.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the passage of Senate bill 2 and its implications for Congress.
Share
More from David Thomas
I rise in support of democracy and in opposition to aristocracy, and simply and humbly request I have the same clock that was just used. How much time do I have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California is…
That is boilerplate language that is used. This is something that we do virtually every year because there are always accounting errors, and this allows for the correcting of the accounting errors.
I think this is certainly one of the most important bills we have had before us and one, frankly, that is the most time-constrained of any we have had before us. Normally, we have a good deal of time to talk about bills and we have budget…
What it has to do with is limiting the amount of additions that can be put on supplementals that are designed for Defense spending. The amendment I am offering would attempt to bring some discipline back into the emergency spending…





