Mr. Chairman, this debate is getting a little bizarre. As the gentleman from Massachusetts well knows, the Beck decision applies to nonunion members, to those who are not members of the union. The whole point is, the coerced union dues are being spent. I appreciate the gentleman's attempt to obfuscate the issue. It is union members, not nonunion members.
Discussing the implications of the Beck decision on union dues during a committee debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
Mr. Speaker, so that people again understand the process, notwithstanding the fact we are dealing with what amounts to a tax bill, because of the unusual procedure of using H.R. 6111 as a vehicle, asked for by the bipartisan leadership of…
I began to uncover the research and studies on Iraq Afghanistan War Lung disease, and the devastating effects of the 'burn pits' on service members and civilians.
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…
I have in high regard those Members who focus on issues which they are concerned about in the pension bill, and I know that there are a number of sections that people could focus on in terms of their concern about the bill. And I know it…
Other voices in this conversation
