I rise to discuss an event that happened last week in which I was very disappointed. It was a hearing we had on the FAIR Act or private contracting of Government activities where it is appropriate under what is called the FAIR Act, which was passed in 1998. This was to have been a committee hearing about how you can best do what has been a policy for a very long time; that is, to take those activities within the Federal Government which are not integral to the Government and give the private sector a chance to bid and do those kinds of things. Even though it has not been implemented as it could be and should be, it has been the policy for a very long time--20, 25 years--to do that, to take those things that are not specifically and inordinately Federal activities that could be done and could be done more efficiently by the private sector. So in 1998, we passed a bill called the FAIR Act which required that there be an analysis of all the Government activities in most of the agencies, determine which of those would be eligible for outside contracting, and then move forward on that. I had hoped to testify before the committee. It turned out that I was not available, and also, they thought they had a balance. As I read about it--and I have a couple things I want to put in the Congressional Record--it turned out not to be a balanced hearing at all.
David Thomas: “I rise to discuss an event that happened last week in which I was very disappointed. It was a hearing we had on the FAIR…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a disappointing hearing on the FAIR Act regarding private contracting of government activities.
Share
More from David Thomas
The amendment will bring transparency and discipline, but not order, to this budget process. The budget resolution is supposed to provide a blueprint for Government spending and allocate dollars for appropriators to spend in particular…
I also want to be on record as being opposed to a theocracy. And I will tell you that today, shortly, democracy will be demonstrated when the House of Representatives determines whether or not it sends this compromise measure over to the…
I wish to speak in general about the bill, not on the specific amendments, about what I think we are doing and the importance, frankly, of what we are doing. We are talking, of course, about ethics, about how we function within this body…
Mr. Speaker, so that people again understand the process, notwithstanding the fact we are dealing with what amounts to a tax bill, because of the unusual procedure of using H.R. 6111 as a vehicle, asked for by the bipartisan leadership of…





