So, on a conservative estimate of $15 to $20 billion, but the other side of that coin, I would tell the gentleman, is that actions by this Government in regard to people who hold property put a burden on those private sector individuals to the tune of $15 to $20 billion. There was no discussion about priorities in terms of Government decisions. That is the problem.
David Thomas: “So, on a conservative estimate of $15 to $20 billion, but the other side of that coin, I would tell the gentleman, is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial impact of government actions on property holders.
Share
More from David Thomas
That is boilerplate language that is used. This is something that we do virtually every year because there are always accounting errors, and this allows for the correcting of the accounting errors.
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
In many ways, through my foundation, my last mission is to bring awareness to IAWL and those who are suffering.
Under the rule in consideration of this bill, the minority was allowed a motion to recommit. A motion to recommit was offered. It was clearly on its face nongermane. The Chair has just ruled that that so-called motion to recommit was…





