If we look at No. 1, it says ``deny the right of Federal employees to organize or be fully represented * * *.'' Can the gentleman assure me that fully represented does not mean a full-time person paid for by taxpayers?
David Thomas: “If we look at No. 1, it says ``deny the right of Federal employees to organize or be fully represented * * *.'' Can the…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a proposal regarding Federal employees' rights.
Share
More from David Thomas
I think this is a very equitable and timely distribution of these funds. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
It is now my pleasure to provide 3 minutes in support of H.R. 5638, the compromise that is endorsed by the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, the United States Chamber of Commerce, the majority…
Under the rule in consideration of this bill, the minority was allowed a motion to recommit. A motion to recommit was offered. It was clearly on its face nongermane. The Chair has just ruled that that so-called motion to recommit was…
This legislation is, in essence, a modest effort to provide the structure and resources necessary for citizens, schools, communities and others to undertake projects in the actual locales in which the so-called internment camps were…





