if we look at No. 1, it says ``deny the right of Federal employees to organize or be fully represented * * *.'' Can the gentleman assure me that fully represented does not mean a full-time person paid for by taxpayers?
David Thomas: “if we look at No. 1, it says ``deny the right of Federal employees to organize or be fully represented * * *.'' Can the…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a proposal regarding Federal employees' rights.
Share
More from David Thomas
the gentleman was not timely in his request to appeal the decision of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman will suspend.
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
I am going to support the bill before us, although I don't think it is perfect. I think, frankly, there needs to be some limit on building fences. I cannot imagine building a fence, a 40-foot-tall fence, all across the border. All we would…
as sponsor of this bill, I support continuing to help the thousands of Americans fleeing the hostilities in Lebanon and returning to the safe confines of the United States. As of Sunday, July 23, 20 flights had rescued 3,890 U.S. citizens…





