I am convinced there needs to be a system in the Senate we can depend on and work with, that we can bring it to a vote and decide yes or no. There has to be that system. That is what this is all about. There seems to be a lot of talk, of course, about the individual candidates we are talking about here who have not been able to be dealt with. But the real fact is it is the system that is in question. That is what it is really all about, and I think we need to deal with that issue. There has been obstruction, frankly.
David Thomas: “I am convinced there needs to be a system in the Senate we can depend on and work with, that we can bring it to a vote…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for a dependable voting system in the Senate during a debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
This morning we will have approximately 1 hour of debate prior to the cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the Gulf of Mexico energy security bill. The vote will occur at about 10 o'clock today, and immediately following that vote we…
In many ways, through my foundation, my last mission is to bring awareness to IAWL and those who are suffering.
It is now my pleasure to provide 3 minutes in support of H.R. 5638, the compromise that is endorsed by the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, the United States Chamber of Commerce, the majority…
That is boilerplate language that is used. This is something that we do virtually every year because there are always accounting errors, and this allows for the correcting of the accounting errors.





