What we just heard was an example of a failure to really understand how radical this new idea is, because the gentleman failed to make one particular connection, and that is the end in politics are votes, not money. Money is the name of the means. If in fact we are in the district talking to people, we are in fact going toward the end. If we are in New York, outside our district, that is the means: money. If we are in Hollywood, that is the means: money. When we are in our district, we are working toward the end. Time is money. It is a radical change. It will take time for some Members, who are so focused on money, to appreciate that we can actually get elected without it. It is called hard work. It is called organization. It is time we put the common man back in the picture working to elect someone without looking at dollars. Majority in district empowers people, not big bucks.
David Thomas: “What we just heard was an example of a failure to really understand how radical this new idea is, because the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of grassroots campaigning over monetary influence in politics.
Share
More from David Thomas
it is nice to be back after having nearly a month break. It is a good opportunity to come back and see what the rest of the world is like. I think we have a lot of great challenges before us, and I hope we can accomplish a great deal. To…
I think this is a very equitable and timely distribution of these funds. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
I have a point of order. Beginning your statement with ``this is why it is germane'' is not addressing the germaneness question. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman must address his comments to the issue of germaneness of the motion to…
I yield myself briefly. All we have to do to provide an increase in the minimum wage is to vote ``yes.'' And I wonder how that person working for a minimum wage feels when you say, I couldn't vote ``yes'' for the increase in the minimum…





