The government argued that moving away from Austin would be a disruption of the system...
I don't agree with how this case has been characterized by some of my colleagues.
The majority wrote this court now concludes that independent expenditures including those made by Corporations do not despite huge Congressi...
Thank you. On behalf of the chairman, thank you for your kind remarks and thank you for your very avid participation in the entire hearing.
I think that people can have a lot of different opinions, but... the facts, what records show, what the trial courts found, that is where th...
I would just caution the public in inferring too much from positions as an advocate.
It wasn't about banning books or about restricting who can speak, it was about Congress making its best judgment on limits on how much can b...
Congress came to the common sense conclusion that these expenditures had a poisonous effect on our democracy.
Congress never would have intended that because it is impractical.
What is the role of pragmatism in judging in this sense?
But was it improper for Justice Scalia to consider dictionary definitions?