I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. No one in the House has more respect for him. He consistently characterized my statement as having nothing to do with this bill. Now, I know that he knows a lot about a lot of subjects, but when the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, the drug czar, Mr. Brown, and all of the people that have developed over the years some expertise in fighting this problem, and they ask for $152.4 million, and the gentleman, with all of his expertise, gives them $100 million, under what type of logic is he saying that he did not cut the President's request.
Charles Rangel: “I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. No one in the House has more respect for him. He consistently characterized my…”
On the recordMay 25, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding for drug control efforts during House debate.
Share
More from Charles Rangel
Jul 12, 2016
Because their testimony was so important, I wonder whether any of you have any suggestions to how this panel could be more effective in getting this message out to our country.
Sep 12, 2016
I have universities that have campuses all over the world. Are you telling me, Mr. McCluskey, that my national security is going to be tied up because university presidents want to make an appeal to families that want their kids to go all…
Sep 12, 2016
Once again, Mr. Chairman, I thank you for your insight in using the Oversight Committee to help us wrestle with some serious national problems.





