as we close this debate, I agree it will be a different Congress, and I will sincerely miss the spirited debate from the distinguished gentleman from California who has served the committee and served the Congress and served this country so well. And I am just bothered that he is disturbed about the lateness of the amendment which comes to the floor, but, of course, you cannot amend anything until you get it, and this just came to the floor this morning. Many of the issues and extenders in this bill are long overdue, and I certainly encourage people to support the bill. But the bill would be strengthened if indeed it excluded the provision that has been debated and will come up in the amendment as relates to the gulf opportunity zone property. In addition to that, most of us would agree that if there is one provision in the Tax Code, a burden that Republicans, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, can agree to that should be removed is the alternative minimum tax. Nobody ever intended for these 23 million people to be shoved into a tax bracket that they didn't deserve.
Charles Rangel: “as we close this debate, I agree it will be a different Congress, and I will sincerely miss the spirited debate from the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax provisions and amendments during a debate on a bill.
Share
More from Charles Rangel
So please help us to help our constituents, to help our country. And then on the question as to whether you don't have the resources to do it, because we know how badly the Congress has treated you, talk about that. But don't say it can't…
Nobody can challenge the fact that, with TPP, we are going to have to have a workforce that is extremely talented in math, science, and technology.
I support the idea of providing incentives to the Tax Code for community colleges, for low-income students...
it doesn't justify it--has absolutely nothing to do with them not fulfilling their moral responsibilities to treat Americans and taxpayers with the dignity that they deserve.





