First of all, when we talk about the Caribbean Basin parity bill, the word ``parity'' means that we already had an agreement with these countries in the Caribbean. We already reached out to our neighbors in the area and said that we are living now in a decade where we do not want to talk about just aid. We want to talk about commerce. We want to talk about trade. We want to talk about support for democracies. So when we went into an agreement with the North American Free Trade Agreement, what happened was that they got an edge on these little countries in the Caribbean and the President and the Congress said, hey, we promised to give them parity. So we are not talking about something new. We are talking about something we have been waiting for for years and that is to bring some equity in our relationship and our trade agreements with these countries in the Caribbean so that they would not be adversely affected by NAFTA.
Charles Rangel: “First of all, when we talk about the Caribbean Basin parity bill, the word ``parity'' means that we already had an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Caribbean Basin parity bill and its implications for trade agreements.
Share
More from Charles Rangel
Because their testimony was so important, I wonder whether any of you have any suggestions to how this panel could be more effective in getting this message out to our country.
I am for national health insurance, but that doesn't mean to me that wealthy people can't kick it up to any notch they want for any other type of medical attention that they can afford.
Listen, if this was our grandkids that was going through this, we will find some way to expedite it. These are our grandkids. They vote, you know?
If they can't give us any idea how long it would take to repair this emergency situation--which stains the government, it stains the executive branch, and it stains us--maybe we should set a date for our next hearing.





