The amendment would strike the funding for the redundant provision that is in the 1998 Public Housing Act that requires tenants in public housing to do community work. It has taken about 3 years for HUD to put together the regulations in order to guide this, and HUD does not oppose the striking of the funds that are imposed upon the tenants in public housing, because there is no other provisions for other people that receive Federal funds to do this type of thing. In addition to it, the local and State communities are all working hard under the welfare reform legislation to see that people who are able to work can work, and it is an unfunded mandate, and I am certain that HUD could be using the funds for other purposes. I understand the authorizing committee has no objections to this.
Charles Rangel: “The amendment would strike the funding for the redundant provision that is in the 1998 Public Housing Act that requires…”
On the recordJuly 30, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to strike funding related to community work requirements in public housing.
Share
More from Charles Rangel
Jul 12, 2016
Gone are the days where trade simply meant reducing tariffs and limiting quotas for imported products.
May 23, 2016
no matter what differences one might have with you, we all know that it is a common goal to make America stronger.
May 23, 2016
It is absolutely stupid to say that: Working gives you self-esteem, it gives you pride, it gives you family unity, it keeps you out of trouble, it gives you health, and it gives you what it is like to be an American.
Jul 6, 2016
I can see how you can disagree with Obama and Democratic majorities, but for God's sake, if you think we are doing it wrong, you should have an alternative to do it right.





