Carolyn Maloney

Personally, I think we should take opioids totally off the market unless you are in hospice, because it is harmful to people.

I think removing that rating completely--it should not be anywhere--it should be removed, and I think the incentive should be changed to what are you doing to prevent having to go on opioids.

I particularly find purging voters from files without any notice or followup really depriving American citizens of their right to vote.

That's outrageous that all the machines are broken. I don't think anyone should be deprived of the right to vote because a machine is broken.

I don't think anyone should be deprived of the right to vote because of a technicality.

Many of our ancestors gave their lives for us to have the right to vote.

Among her many accomplishments she is the lead sponsor of H.J. Res. 35, which proposes a new Equal Rights Amendment.

Women are long past due equal treatment under the law and we will not be satisfied until it is guaranteed in stone.

Not having an ERA has real consequences for real women.

We demand what is right--full equality now.

With all due respect, the Equal Rights Amendment has absolutely nothing to do with abortion.

Our rights cannot be subjected to the political whims of legislators, judges, or occupants of the White House.

Well, actions speak louder than words on guns, Mr. Dimon, and from what I can tell, these are just words to you.

After the Parkland shooting last year, where a lone gunman killed 17 students and staff with a military-style semiautomatic rifle, two of the banks on this panel, Citibank and Bank of America, stepped up to the plate and adopted formal…

So my question is, will you live up to your own rhetoric? Will you commit to adopting a formal policy that ensures responsible lending in your bank's business with the gun industry?

What we need is strong leadership to combat the crisis of climate change... this is an American challenge, it is a bipartisan challenge.

What we have instead is a White House which is considering a new panel to deny that climate change really exists.

Did you read the analysis from Dr. Abowd, which I would place in the record? Yes or no.

We believe that adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census will considerably increase the risk to the 2020 enumeration.

two Federal judges ruled that you broke the Federal law and have ordered that the question, the citizenship question, be removed.

There's been so much discussion about the history of the census.

Judge Furman of the Southern District of New York called your decision, quote, arbitrary and capricious and a veritable smorgasbord of clear-cut administrative procedure act violations, end quote.

First of all, I want to thank you, Mr. Chairman for calling this important hearing.

I am a proud cosponsor of the Fair Chance Act and think that our Federal Government should follow the example of 34 states, including my own home state of New York that has enacted similar legislation.

I would like to publicly thank you for including language that I presented in the last Congress...