I commend the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Oxley], the author of the amendment to H.R. 5, for his efforts in bringing this issue to the floor. I support this proposal which seeks to clarify the original legislative intent in the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act of 1990. The language in this act requires the States to institute water quality programs consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency's Great Lakes guidance, but in no way requires the States to adopt regulations which identically comply with the specific elements of the Great Lakes guidance. Accordingly, Mr. Chairman, it will be helpful to clarify the intent of this section of the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act.
Benjamin Gilman: “I commend the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Oxley], the author of the amendment to H.R. 5, for his efforts in bringing this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to clarify legislative intent in the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act.
Share
More from Benjamin Gilman
Mr. Chairman, lest our friends on the other side of the aisle forget that the Plan Colombia concept was a Clinton administration proposal to help save Colombia from becoming a failed narco-state on the Clinton watch, we need to stay the…
the use of eradication aerial spraying in Colombia, while controversial, when put into overall perspective is not as alarming as many would have us believe. While I admire the objective of the gentleman who presented the amendment, the…
I rise in support of H.R. 3969, the Freedom Promotion Act. Mr. Speaker, Chairman Hyde has crafted a superb bill and I am proud of him and of our Committee. The bill, as our Committee report states, is intended to ``enhance in scope and…
the U.S.-Jordan Free Trade Agreement with the United States is good for Jordan, good for the United States and good for peace in the Middle East. By eliminating trade barriers between both our countries, it will increase trade. In doing…





