I commend the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Oxley], the author of the amendment to H.R. 5, for his efforts in bringing this issue to the floor. I support this proposal which seeks to clarify the original legislative intent in the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act of 1990. The language in this act requires the States to institute water quality programs consistent with the Environmental Protection Agency's Great Lakes guidance, but in no way requires the States to adopt regulations which identically comply with the specific elements of the Great Lakes guidance. Accordingly, Mr. Chairman, it will be helpful to clarify the intent of this section of the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act.
Benjamin Gilman: “I commend the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Oxley], the author of the amendment to H.R. 5, for his efforts in bringing this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to clarify legislative intent in the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act.
Share
More from Benjamin Gilman
I represent the area around the Stewart Airport, and I want the gentleman to know just today we have been meeting with the FAA to emphasize the need for using regional airports, such as Stewart, to alleviate the congestion of LaGuardia…
That is my understanding of what the committee intended. The amendment to ILSA made by section 4 of H.R. 1954 applies both to Iran and Libya.
H.R. 1161, which enjoys bi-partisan support was introduced earlier this session and authorizes the Government of the Czech Republic to establish a memorial in honor of Tomas Garrigue Masaryk, the first President of Czechoslovakia. By…
Well, apparently it is being used in our own country as well. The EPA has approved it.





