I share the outrage and disappointment expressed by my constituents. However, the President's actions violated our Nation's trust. The debate is no more about sex than the Watergate debate was about a third-rate burglary. This is a difficult decision for all of us, probably the most difficult of my tenure in the Congress. I thank my constituents who shared their views. While none of us should minimize the gravity of this impeachment process, we must bear in mind that the House does not have the final word in determining whether any official should be removed from office. Referral of this issue to the Senate is not removal, but merely a finding of probable cause that a removeable offense may have occurred. Having fully considered the facts before us, reluctantly I have come to the conclusion that probable cause exists. Accordingly, I shall be voting in favor of at least one of the articles of impeachment. In closing, I note that though I support the articles of impeachment, I am not convinced that the President should be removed. In fact, that decision can only be made after a fair trial in the other body.
Benjamin Gilman: “I share the outrage and disappointment expressed by my constituents. However, the President's actions violated our…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impeachment process of President Clinton during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Benjamin Gilman
I came to Washington 30 years ago, and I had the honor and privilege to represent our Hudson Valley region of New York, our State, and our Nation during that period of time. That has afforded me the opportunity to witness and to…
I would like to take time to voice my support for H. Con. Res. 102. Sub-Saharan Africa is clearly a region afflicted by poverty. Despite some positive economic and political changes in sub-Saharan Africa, it remains an area of the world…
This measure reaffirms our special relationship between our Nation and the Republic of the Philippines. This resolution notes that special relationship of mutual benefit which goes back for more than 100 years, this year marking the 50th…
I rise in response to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' declaration that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because it contains the words ``under God'' which were added by Congress in 1954. The Federal Court's decision is an…





