Just in response, of course we would like to be supportive of the gentleman's proposal. What we are concerned about is the limited amount of time in this measure to enable Members on both sides of the aisle to take up their amendments. I hope the gentleman will be able to present his bill as a free standing bill shortly after the consideration of this measure so that the House will have a full opportunity to debate the gentleman's measure.
Benjamin Gilman: “Just in response, of course we would like to be supportive of the gentleman's proposal. What we are concerned about is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about time limitations for amendments during House debate.
Share
More from Benjamin Gilman
I am very concerned that Chinese-American citizens and U.S. permanent residents of Chinese ancestry are being illegally held by the government of the People's Republic of China. There is no rule of law in that country. In China a person is…
That is my understanding of what the committee intended. The amendment to ILSA made by section 4 of H.R. 1954 applies both to Iran and Libya.
Well, apparently it is being used in our own country as well. The EPA has approved it.
Section 1601 of the State Department Authorization Conference Agreement addresses nuclear missile nonproliferation in South Asia. I have reservations about the provision. U.S.--India relations are strong and both countries are looking…





