If I were President Obama, I would be very careful about going after Mitt Romney on his flip-flops, where indeed he did change his position on gay rights and on abortion.
Ari Fleischer
The Public Record
Ari Fleischer is a Republican political consultant and former White House Press Secretary under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2003. He played a significant role in communicating the administration's policies and responses during pivotal events, including the September 11 attacks and the subsequent War on Terror. Fleischer is known for his defense of the administration's stance on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, a key justification for the invasion in 2003. After leaving the White House, he has worked as a media consultant and commentator, providing insights on political communication and strategy.
I find it an interesting new development in politics that President Obama's authorized his staff to -- they went after Huntsman, they have gone after Perry, they have gone after Romney.
I never did. I don't really know anybody who did think she would get in. But now that she's not, you know, it's a good thing for the Republican field. It removes what would have been an element of chaos in the Republican Party and this…
There's this sense in Republican politics that almost does no matter who you are, what you do, you will get accused of being a racist.
There’s just this sense in Republican politics that almost doesn’t matter who you are and what you do, you’ll get accused of being a racist. And when it happens, people rally.
That's why a lot of people stay out of politics, Anderson, because one word and then somebody's accusing you of being a racist.
Herman Cain is resonating because he's got that outsider perspective.
But clearly there are blocs in this country who vote the way they do.
There are voter blocs in this country that for whatever the reason they decide to vote overwhelmingly one way or another.
I think he's somebody who has a good chance to end up in that third slot and nobody knows what can happen from there.
Washington needs to have fundamental substantive changes in the taxes and the spending.
What's happening in the Republican primary right now is this fascinating dynamic where there still is a search under way for who will be the leader of the Republican Party.
I think the battle for third in the Republican primary is behind Romney and Perry, the two frontrunners, is a terribly important battle because I think it is very possible one of the two frontrunners is going to stumble.
What you're also seeing, Anderson, is almost unprecedented in modern Republican politics. The no front-runner issue.
If she goes this time, frankly, and I'm neutral in this Republican primary, but it would be a dream come true for Mitt Romney.
I just think it's too late. Too much time has passed by. And it is so hard to build a successful presidential campaign.
But the president has got a problem about shoring up the center, independents. And that's where I think this -- this proposal of his is going to fall short both substantively and politically.
Well, I don't think it's that simple, Anderson. People always say make somebody else do it, I don't want to. But that's not how you build a strong nation and that's not what presidents should do.
Perry's gamble is that the American people really do want to push for greater change in entitlement programs, that they're ready for something fundamental.
I think that Republicans have to be a little careful here that Social Security does not become the defining issue that divides them in this primary.
I would put Michele Bachmann, I would put Mitt Romney, I would put Governor Perry.
I don't believe there is a Republican front runner. I think every candidate has sufficient strengths and sufficient weaknesses that nobody is in first place by enough to call them a front runner.





