Anthony Weiner: “I agree that we are legislating on an appropriation bill, and I agree it is out of order to oppose or pass the notion…”

“I agree that we are legislating on an appropriation bill, and I agree it is out of order to oppose or pass the notion that every State should have a minimum guarantee. It is exactly that ruling and exactly that language from the chairman that I would ask you to keep in mind when we consider other legislation. Minimum guarantees are not the way we legislate around here. We legislate based on need; and, frankly, it is clear that we are not allocating homeland security resources. And just the way this will be ruled out of order, I hope you keep that in mind when we consider those measures as well. The Acting CHAIRMAN. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? Hearing none, the Chair finds that this amendment includes language imparting direction. The amendment therefore constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained. The amendment is not in order. Amendment Offered by Mr. Garrett of New Jersey”