So the Chair is deciding, notwithstanding the fact that a Member is standing here to speak about the plan to end Medicare, not to mention Members are here seeking to be recognized, I believe of both parties, the Chair is choosing at this moment that this is the propitious moment to cut off debate, early in the evening when we have plenty of work to do and Members seek to speak and offer amendments? Is the Chair deciding arbitrarily, or was she given guidance to do this by the Republican leadership who don't want to hear any more critique of their plans to end Medicare? The Acting CHAIR. The Chair is exercising her discretion to resume proceedings on a postponed question at any time. Pursuant to clause 6----
Anthony Weiner: “So the Chair is deciding, notwithstanding the fact that a Member is standing here to speak about the plan to end…”
Share
More from Anthony Weiner
I have made terrible mistakes, that have hurt the people I care about the most, and I am deeply sorry.
As I've said in the past, these things that I did were wrong and hurtful to my wife and caused us to go through many challenges in our marriage that extended past my resignation from Congress. While some of the things that have been posted…
At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani]
I'm here today to again apologize for the personal mistakes I have made and the embarrassment I have caused. I make this apology to my neighbors and my constituents, but I make it particularly to my wife Huma. Today I'm announcing my…





