Mr. Nadler, the correct pronunciation of my last name is D'Esposito. Thank you. The reason why this amendment is on the floor is because members of the party on the opposite side of the aisle have made it a popular decision to target law enforcement, to make their jobs more difficult, to legitimately take the handcuffs that are on their gun belt and use them on the cop so they can't do their job. That is why this amendment is important. It is important to honor law enforcement. It is important to recognize law enforcement. This is very simple. It is a bill of rights. It is giving them the ability to do the job that they took an oath to do. They rose their right hand, they swore on a Bible to protect, to serve, to go out each and every day and stand that line that I mentioned between good and evil. The fact that any Member of this House of Representatives who claims to support law enforcement, who likes to put those tweets of thoughts and prayers, God forbid, when a member of law enforcement loses their life. Thoughts and prayers when an officer gets killed is not enough. What we need to do is supply them with a bill of rights. What we need to do is to implore States to do the same. That is why I am asking all my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to do the right thing. Today is about supporting law enforcement. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Anthony D'Esposito
May I inquire as to how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York (Mr. D'Esposito) has 1 minute remaining.
I have a motion at the desk to refer the resolution to the Committee on Ethics. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to refer. The Clerk read as follows: Mr. D'Esposito of New York moves to refer the resolution to the…
Just over 3 hours ago, we walked onto this floor with a plan and an opportunity to make sure that our government continues to work. Instead of moving that plan forward, we have spent the last hour hearing from a Member on the other side of…
Due to unforeseen circumstances, I was unable to participate in voting. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 388, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 389, ``nay'' on rollcall No. 390, and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 391…





