I am deeply disappointed in your efforts to delay this potentially lifesaving rule.

I do not take the responsibility to lead this agency and execute its mission lightly.

I voted against it because I think there is a jurisdictional issue with the EPA, as they control emissions.

The power of the purse was harder to ignore.

If I could add one thing to that, because this is consistent with the theme of our agency reacting rather than being proactive.

I don't consider the constitution a red herring.

When it came to the ROV issue, I must say the engagement of Congress and your oversight was extremely helpful and very effective.

I do not think it is justified, and I think one of the things the agency has to do is consider risk.

Your close attention to our budget does make a difference and can truly affect our agency's behavior.

Some is meaningful, some really achieves good results, and in some cases, it doesn't.

Will social media help that? If so, how can we do that?