the conference report on S. 652 is finally being considered by the Senate. We have heard much about the positive changes to this bill and the ramifications for the telecommunications industry. But I must still express my concern about the absence of a provision that I see as vital to the protection of the American consumer. I am referring to the capability of telecommunication entities to develop monopolies and dominate marketplaces to the detriment of the consumer. This Nation learned through long and hard experience that laissez-faire attitudes towards industries does not protect smaller entities when larger competition comes along and certainly does not provide safeguards where consumers are concerned. I acknowledge the roles of government oversight that the bill does now provide. But the larger corporations will not be constrained in their ability, should they desire, to monopolize media and various telecommunication mediums. And in our effort to allow such an environment do we want to place the consumer on the altar of deregulation?
On the recordFebruary 1, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about consumer protection in the telecommunications industry during Senate debate on S. 652.
Share
More from Harry Reid
Mar 15, 2021
The country is better off having a real democracy, not a fake democracy. Sixty percent is not a democracy.
Dec 9, 2016
we have now three hours until 10 o'clock. I hope that during that period of time, people will do whatever they need to do to make sure they get anything they want in, whatever they are trying to get. The reason I say that is that we are…
Mar 7, 2017
it is unclear what . . . duty [third-party set-top box providers] would have to protect programming content or otherwise comply with the licensing agreements
Sep 30, 2021
The Senate is a place to kill things. It isn’t a place that you look to get things done.





