Mr. Speaker, I rise today to voice my opposition to the conference report on S. 636, the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. Although this conference report contains important changes in the original legislation, most notably the extension of this bill's protections to places of religious worship and the exemption from penalty for parent's of underage daughters, it still violates equal protection by penalizing individuals for their beliefs. For instance, if a group decided to stage a peaceful protest against a hospital because of improper disposal of medical waste and on the same day a pro-life group decided to stage a peaceful protest against the hospital because they perform abortions, only the pro-life group would be prosecuted under the Freedom of Access to Clinic's Act. This would clearly be a case of the Government prosecuting someone because of their viewpoint and not because of their actions. It is unthinkable that we will be making Federal criminals out of a grandmother peacefully praying on a sidewalk or a young mother quietly handing out pamphlets with her children in front of an abortion clinic, but that is what we are doing today when we vote for this conference report. That is why I urge my colleagues to vote against this conference report. We should not take away the first amendment rights of millions of pro-life Americans.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act during House floor debate.
Share
More from Barbara Vucanovich
I thank the gentleman for yielding time to me. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to speak in ardent opposition to the adoption of the so-called assault weapons ban legislation. I rise today not to speak eloquently like so many of my colleagues…
I opposed Mr. Clinton's nuclear testing moratorium last year and his continued ``no testing policy'' concerns me greatly. I say this with extreme concern because as American foreign policy under the Clinton administration continues like a…
H.R. 2 gives the President true line-item veto authority, empowering him to disallow specific items in spending bills without having to veto the entire legislation--which may contain worthwhile and necessary programs. Perhaps more…
I strongly support the budget proposed by the gentlewoman from Maryland and I am appalled that we will not even be allowed to consider it during these discussions over the budget resolution. By increasing each line item of Federal spending…





