H.R. 2 gives the President true line-item veto authority, empowering him to disallow specific items in spending bills without having to veto the entire legislation--which may contain worthwhile and necessary programs. Perhaps more importantly, H.R. 2 places the burden on Congress to act initially to reject a President's rescission message. Too often, spending bills passed by Congress contain items, especially pork-barrel projects, that would not stand up to the test of an individual vote. If used in a conscientious manner, the authority that H.R. 2 confers on the President could indeed help effectively cut wasteful spending out of the Federal budget. I support H.R. 2 and urge my colleagues to likewise support this important measure.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Line-Item Veto Act and its implications for federal budget management.
Share
More from Barbara Vucanovich
I opposed Mr. Clinton's nuclear testing moratorium last year and his continued ``no testing policy'' concerns me greatly. I say this with extreme concern because as American foreign policy under the Clinton administration continues like a…
this amendment restores $8 million for the Pyramid Lake water rights settlement. Funds available from a previous amendment which reduced funding from the territorial assistance account is sufficient to offset this amendment. This water…
I believe we are compiling a record of success and that the corrections calendar will become heavily relied upon by the House as a way to fix past errors. The American people are demanding a more responsive Government, and corrections day…
I stumbled into it by accident. I did an internship in anesthesia. I worked for a year in general practice in Alabama. I did two years in general surgery, then switched into family practice to get board certified. My intentions at that…





