I rise to invite my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to cosign a letter with me to our colleague, the gentleman from Iowa [Mr. Smith], who is the chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, and Judiciary of the Committee on Appropriations. The purpose of this letter is to ask Mr. Smith not to follow the administration's recommendations in the Justice Department's proposed budget that would actually reduce the number of Federal personnel devoted to fighting crime. In the administration's proposed budget, there is a recommendation to lose personnel in the criminal division of the Department of Justice, to lose permanent positions in the Drug Enforcement Administration and Federal Bureau of Investigation, and even in the number of criminal prosecutors in the U.S. attorneys' offices around the country. At the same time, the administration proposed increasing the number of personnel in the antitrust division. Now, I have no opposition, of course, to prosecuting antitrust cases, but the President of the United States has very correctly and very strongly emphasized the need to prosecute the violent criminals in our society. And the President will not be able to do so without the tools to get that job done, both under the current law and under any new crime bill that we might pass.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budget cuts to federal law enforcement personnel during a discussion on crime policy.
Share
More from Steven Schiff
Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from New Jersey asked where did I get the idea that the policy in this bill as written is designed to release people that should not be released. The answer is in the idea of where alternative sentencing is…
this is an attempt to legislate through label. By mistakenly placing the title ``assault weapons'' arbitrarily on this group of firearms, and having the term ``assault weapons'' repeated over and over and over again in much of the media…
the bill, as presented to the House floor from the Committee on the Judiciary, said that one serious drug offense could be used as one of the three strikes for the purpose of life imprisonment. The House voted a moment ago to raise that to…
I rise in support of the Chapman amendment and urge my colleagues to vote for it. It makes the point we wish to promote truth in sentencing around the country. It is my opinion that one of the greatest failings in the system today is that…





