this is an attempt to legislate through label. By mistakenly placing the title ``assault weapons'' arbitrarily on this group of firearms, and having the term ``assault weapons'' repeated over and over and over again in much of the media, it has served to totally confuse the issue about what weapons we are talking about here. It has even confused matters on the House floor. I heard a senior Member of the House just a moment ago say we need to ban automatic weapons. There is not a single automatic weapon in this bill. That is because automatic weapons--these are the true military combat weapons which can be set for constant fire with one pull of the trigger--are banned today. The weapons we are actually talking about do not fire any differently than the weapons that are not banned. If there were a difference between them, the proponents of this bill would have demonstrated that on the range by placing one against the other in a test that the media and the public could see. But I think that the real crux of this bill, the real way to know if this is legitimate law enforcement, in which I consider certain gun control proposals apart, or just grandstanding is the fact that this bill, if it becomes law today, will not ban a single weapon today. The law exempts all of the weapons that are called assault weapons today. Every one who owns one legally can keep one legally.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications and definitions of the proposed assault weapons ban.
Share
More from Steven Schiff
I rise to correct five misstatements about this bill and the weapons it contains that have already been made on the House floor this morning. First, these are not assault weapons. True assault weapons are true military weapons. That means…
I rise to invite my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to cosign a letter with me to our colleague, the gentleman from Iowa [Mr. Smith], who is the chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, and Judiciary of the Committee…
I do not oppose the idea of alternative sentencing where it is deserved in the particular case, where a criminal can most likely be rehabilitated in society. The problem is that this provision that requires the management of resources, as…
I rise in support of the Chapman amendment and urge my colleagues to vote for it. It makes the point we wish to promote truth in sentencing around the country. It is my opinion that one of the greatest failings in the system today is that…





