the Oil-for-Food fraud is possibly the largest scandal in the history of the United Nations and one of the greatest financial scandals of modern times. Set up in the mid-1990s as a means of providing humanitarian aid to the Iraqi people, the U.N.-run Oil-for-Food program was subverted and manipulated by Saddam Hussein's regime, allegedly with complicity of U.N. officials to help prop up the Iraqi dictator. Saddam's dictatorship was able to siphon off an estimated $10 billion from the program through oil smuggling and systematic thievery by demanding illegal payments from companies buying Iraqi oil and through kickbacks from those selling goods to Iraq, all under the noses of U.N. bureaucrats. Members of the U.N. staff that have administered the program have been accused of gross incompetence, mismanagement, and possible complicity with the Iraqi regime. Benon Sevan, former executive director of the Oil-for-Food program appeared on an Iraqi oil minister list of 270 individuals, political entities and companies from across the world that allegedly received oil vouchers as bribes from Saddam Hussein's regime. The U.S.'s General Accounting Office estimates that the Saddam Hussein regime generated $10.1 billion in illegal revenues by exploiting the Oil-for-Food program. These figures include $5.7 billion from oil smuggling and $4.4 billion in illicit surcharges on sales and after-sales charges on suppliers.
Steve Pearce: “the Oil-for-Food fraud is possibly the largest scandal in the history of the United Nations and one of the greatest…”
On the recordJuly 13, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Oil-for-Food program and its alleged corruption during a speech.
Share
More from Steve Pearce
Nov 3, 2015
These are huge warning signs to us, and we are sitting here talking about some relatively small stress tests inside different banks.
Jul 19, 2017
The flags are still in the ground, and the jobs are gone. And, by the way, the Chinese started charging 35 percent excise tax on the rare earth minerals, because they want to put our manufacturers out of business.
Feb 10, 2016
I think that the better option is the competition drives the bad ones out of business.
May 8, 2016
So Washington can say the border is secure all they want, and I appreciate reading your testimony, sir, that says that we have work to do and we need to be more transparent, more honest.





