It's important, but unless I'm missing something, we're doing this pretty quickly.
We can ask them, but the damage we would do to them would be irresponsible.
We couldn't do that at 420,000.
It's going to be very tough.
Below 450,000, we don't think we'd be able to do it.
What risks are we taking on by doing that?
Even without sequestration, we're proposing significant reductions, are we not?
Any objective analysis of the global security environment demonstrates that the world is becoming more--not less--dangerous.
When Congress fails to provide proper training and equipment, we risk being confronted with two unacceptable options: deploying troops into ...
I also want to pass along my condolences to those who have suffered at the Naval Station at Norfolk.
Isn't investing in our acquisition workforce likely to pay for itself many times over in lower acquisition costs?