If we prohibit them, what would be the result? Frankly, I do not think very much, because Senators would, as a substitute, offer small changes in dollars in a regular amendment with some very long statements of the purpose. There is no way, I suggest, to get out of such votes, whether they are sense of the Senate or not. In a way, I will simply say as much as we all may find sense-of-the-Senate amendments a bother to deal with, the alternative may actually be worse. Sense-of-the-Senate amendments allow the Senate to let off steam on a particular subject without actually spending any more money or, even better, making more laws that have not been thought through. Sometimes that can be a useful thing just to let off steam.
J. Exon: “If we prohibit them, what would be the result? Frankly, I do not think very much, because Senators would, as a…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to prohibit sense-of-the-Senate amendments during Senate debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
I recommend that all Senators vote in favor of the amendment. I would simply point out that the amendment does nothing more than what the States can already do. I will vote for this amendment, and the one that follows. I will strongly…
If we want to look at the productivity of America, I think we ought to put that in terms that people can understand: not productivity, but job growth. The percentage of change on an annual basis during the Reagan/Bush years--and I think it…
With that fee schedule that you just outlined right from the Surface Transportation Board paper, how many complaints do you think small businessmen, small elevators, would file out of North Dakota?
I will simply point out that the Exon amendment still allows for a $9 billion increase over what the President and the Pentagon has recommended. I would think, regardless of the technical details, that most realize and recognize that such…





