If we prohibit them, what would be the result? Frankly, I do not think very much, because Senators would, as a substitute, offer small changes in dollars in a regular amendment with some very long statements of the purpose. There is no way, I suggest, to get out of such votes, whether they are sense of the Senate or not. In a way, I will simply say as much as we all may find sense-of-the-Senate amendments a bother to deal with, the alternative may actually be worse. Sense-of-the-Senate amendments allow the Senate to let off steam on a particular subject without actually spending any more money or, even better, making more laws that have not been thought through. Sometimes that can be a useful thing just to let off steam.
J. Exon: “If we prohibit them, what would be the result? Frankly, I do not think very much, because Senators would, as a…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to prohibit sense-of-the-Senate amendments during Senate debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
To the discussion of how we can justify this increase that is not requested by the Pentagon.
these programs, in the opinion of most senior military leaders, are unnecessary. Even if the Pentagon had the money, the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs have said that they would not fund these programs this year, not next year…
I will simply say to him that everything that I had just said in my statement in this regard is totally accurate, to the best of my knowledge. With regard to his counterarguments that this is going to help the President of the United…
Mr. President, there is obviously some serious misunderstanding here, because Senator Kyl has not correctly stated the existing law by suggesting that any other nuclear state could conduct a nuclear test after September 30, and before the…





