I noted with interest the comment the Senator from Texas made. We just debated it a day or so ago. The provisions of the 1993 act that have been roundly criticized and are again being criticized now, raised taxes on only the top 13 percent-- the top 13 percent--of retirees. By contrast, the 1983 Reagan tax increase, which was the first tax increase that ever addressed taxation of any kind on Social Security, was supported by the sponsor of this amendment. I simply say that will raise taxes for 22 percent of the retirees. This amendment would cost over $33 billion. Mr. President, I yield back the remainder of my time.
J. Exon: “I noted with interest the comment the Senator from Texas made. We just debated it a day or so ago. The provisions of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of tax increases on retirees during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from J. Exon
While the Senator from Virginia and I have not always agreed on all subjects, we have agreed on more than we have disagreed on. I could not help but ask for a moment, if I might, to congratulate the Senator from Virginia for his very…
If I might add a comment. It seems to me that if there is that much money out there to get this job done, we might seize on that as a means of balancing the Federal budget in 2 years. I thank my friend from North Dakota.
With that fee schedule that you just outlined right from the Surface Transportation Board paper, how many complaints do you think small businessmen, small elevators, would file out of North Dakota?
I recommend that all Senators vote in favor of the amendment. I would simply point out that the amendment does nothing more than what the States can already do. I will vote for this amendment, and the one that follows. I will strongly…





