Chuck Hagel

I've always argued against some of the dumb things they do because I don't think it's in the interest of Israel.

I will make that commitment to do everything I can to first understand the specifics, which I don't know all the details.

I've never thought engagement is weakness. I never thought it was surrender. I never thought it was appeasement.

I didn't hear her say that, by the way, of the United States, and I think my comment was it is a relevant and good observation.

I recognize that, and yes, I would reconsider.

North Korea's December Taepo Dong II missile launch and recent threats to conduct a third nuclear test underscore the growing North Korean threat to international peace and security.

I am a supporter of Israel. In some cases, I have said I am a strong supporter of Israel.

This is a far ranging issue that will warrant significant attention from me, if confirmed.

Accountability is always the most important tool for leader evaluation.

The President has made clear that the United States will respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would any other threat to our country.

No, it was I think in a larger context. I've said many, many things over many years.

I continue to support the substance of the letter--expressing solidarity with Israel at a time of crisis--and I will continue to express this solidarity and support as I work with my Israeli counterparts if confirmed as Secretary of…

Iran poses a significant threat to the United States, our allies, and partners, and our interests in the region and globally.

Sequestration may have irreversible impacts in the long term.

It is not inconsistent, I don't believe, Senator.

The President has been clear that U.S. economic and security interests are inextricably tied to the Asia-Pacific.

If confirmed, I will focus on strengthening our relationships, building the capacity of key allies and partners.

I believe that we should make available to Taiwan those defense articles and defense services which enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, today and into the future.

my main criteria will be to ensure that DOD investments enhance readiness and warfighting effectiveness and increase our national security.

I support the President's commitment to a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent as long as nuclear weapons exist.

The Department must take care of its people, not only while they are serving, but it is an obligation that continues through the transition to civilian life.

If confirmed, I will ensure future budgets and the upcoming QDR evaluate all options to maximize our strategic objectives.

I did vote against it, and I was going to explain why I voted against it.

Maintaining ready forces is a priority.

Improvements in security conditions, enabled by continued development of the Afghan National Security Forces, will continue to be critical.