Before I start, I will point out that it sounds like we want to cooperate with our foreign neighbors when it comes to environmental control, but we don't want to import energy from them or we don't want to export energy to them. I find that a little bit ironic. That being said, I regretfully stand in opposition to this amendment. After Congress reviewed and preserved the Clean Air Act in 1977, it did play an important role in cross-border pollution issues of the late 1970s with Canada. Before we strike an entire section of the Clean Air Act involving air pollutants, the committee of jurisdiction should examine the issues, particularly to make sure we avoid any unintended consequences. For example, we should make sure that striking this section does not undermine the ability to reduce international air emissions that harm the United States. I commit to working with my friend from Pennsylvania to take this through regular order, but I am a big fan of the committee process. Let's see that it works.
On the recordMarch 29, 2023
Share
More from Kelly Armstrong
Jul 4, 2026
People are going to come here from every corner of the world. And while here, they will come to understand T.R. the way North Dakotans always have: as a man beset by tragedy but on the verge of greatness.
Aug 21, 2026
We’re honored to receive this national Recovery Friendly Workplace certification and thankful for everyone in our administration and those who came before us who have worked to reduce the stigma of addiction and help individuals find hope…
Jun 12, 2026
We’re thankful for the efforts of the Attorney General’s Office and other attorneys who worked on the state’s behalf to secure a favorable ruling in U.S. District Court and ultimately reach a settlement that removes the financial burden…





