Given that Sackett v. EPA is in front of the Supreme Court, and it is likely to provide clarity as to what EPA's authority is over states and landowners, in regard to regulating the waters of the U.S., doesn't it make sense to put a nationwide pause on your WOTUS Rule until the Supreme Court has ruled in the Sackett case?
Hoeven questions the need for a pause on the WOTUS Rule pending Supreme Court clarity.
Share
More from John Hoeven
We already have counter-UAS work underway with the Point Defense Battle Lab and Project ULTRA, and we have even more developments in the works with UND, JIATF 401 and others, so we’re well-equipped to meet this critical defense need for…
We’re working to advance BRIC-funded infrastructure projects in Fessenden, Lincoln and Washburn, as well as the University of Mary’s wastewater improvement project.
Passing legislation in Congress is no small task, but we have now passed two pieces of legislation to ensure the Grand Forks Housing Authority can make updates to LaGrave Place and enhance this 66-unit affordable housing complex," said…
Rescinding the Roadless Rule will return decision making authority to local land managers who are best positioned to address the needs of our communities.
Other voices in this conversation
