as one who did not support the line item veto because I do not think we can always count on the President of the United States, regardless of who he is, not to have some pettiness in his surroundings. But what I do not understand is there was a big push to do the line item veto early on over here, and I understand that this transaction will not go into place until 1997. Why would not the line item veto go and this President have the benefits of it for the next 7 months?
Willie Hefner: “as one who did not support the line item veto because I do not think we can always count on the President of the United…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the line item veto and its implementation timeline.
Share
More from Willie Hefner
as one that is going to leave this place shortly, I certainly hope that we find some way to shore up Social Security. But I would like to not correct one thing but make a comment about what my colleague from California said, about in 1993…
I have an awful lot of respect for the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Shays) and the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Meehan) and the folks that have worked so hard for campaign reform. We are awfully selective around here. I have been…
last evening we had a very contentious debate on the previous question and on the rule on this legislation. It was pretty much of a stretch, but we had something that was passed out to Members from the National Republican Congressional…
I came here with Chairman Hyde, and we came here 24 years ago. I was hoping that I would get more than 20 seconds on this, the most important vote I have cast since I have been here. But the thing that bothers me in this whole process, and…





