I think what we should do is pursue active funding for impact aid for our military bases for quality of life programs which the gentleman from California [Mr. Packard] and I have worked very hard to do, to see that we can have retention for qualified people in our military. But I do not think that it is really kosher for us to come here and pretend to say that if you are going to give this money to NLRB that all these people are going to suffer so much because they do not get the impact aid. This seems to me not a real good, honest argument to make.
Willie Hefner: “I think what we should do is pursue active funding for impact aid for our military bases for quality of life programs…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for military impact aid and criticizing arguments against it.
Share
More from Willie Hefner
I came here with Chairman Hyde, and we came here 24 years ago. I was hoping that I would get more than 20 seconds on this, the most important vote I have cast since I have been here. But the thing that bothers me in this whole process, and…
I am a little bit confused. The Istook amendment I would like if only the Baptists were protected and we can set the prayer and whatever. But that is not what we are talking about. But the way I understand it, and I hope the gentleman from…
I will not talk about the merits of it, but earlier today we talked about a pay raise, and it gets so political. If you think that it is political for the pay raise and demagoguery, this amendment is tailor-made for demagoguery. The…
Why are we building, for my own information, why are we building a highway in Canada? Are we going to take Canada in, or what is the story?





