I think what we should do is pursue active funding for impact aid for our military bases for quality of life programs which the gentleman from California [Mr. Packard] and I have worked very hard to do, to see that we can have retention for qualified people in our military. But I do not think that it is really kosher for us to come here and pretend to say that if you are going to give this money to NLRB that all these people are going to suffer so much because they do not get the impact aid. This seems to me not a real good, honest argument to make.
Willie Hefner: “I think what we should do is pursue active funding for impact aid for our military bases for quality of life programs…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for military impact aid and criticizing arguments against it.
Share
More from Willie Hefner
first, they mentioned ``the two gentlemen from North Carolina,'' and I am one of them. I do not know if I am a gentleman, but as far as the decorum of the House, I certainly, if I offended anybody, I apologize. I am so sorry if I hurt…
Unfortunately, we have got an excellent defense bill. Our chairman, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Young), and the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murtha), has done a tremendous job. But the chairman of the Committee on Rules made a…
there is legislation in both bodies of this Congress that would place an excise tax which I think is very punitive and does not serve the purpose that I believe that we should be doing. I do not believe that anyone wants to support…
last evening we had a very contentious debate on the previous question and on the rule on this legislation. It was pretty much of a stretch, but we had something that was passed out to Members from the National Republican Congressional…





