Davis-Bacon needs to be repealed not only for budgetary reasons--but for commonsense reasons. This law serves no practical purpose in today's world. This law has been protected for many years because it takes Federal taxpayer money and puts it in the pocket of a small, but powerful interest in the form of a wage subsidy. The repeal of Davis-Bacon will open up the Federal construction market to fair and open competition and will eliminate the current monopoly on Federal jobs held by a few large companies. It will open up more construction jobs to semiskilled workers who wish to break into the construction field but are now prevented from doing so. The bottom line, Mr. Speaker, is the repeal of Davis-Bacon will give all American taxpayers a break on Federal construction costs. The Budget Committee has acted on this mandate. It is time for the rest of Congress to do the same.
Sue Myrick: “Davis-Bacon needs to be repealed not only for budgetary reasons--but for commonsense reasons. This law serves no…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act during a committee markup.
Share
More from Sue Myrick
Today, I reintroduce the Scott Gardner Act. Tragically, Scott Gardner, who was a loving husband and father, was killed by a drunk illegal alien who remained in our country even though he had previous DWI convictions. And we have had other…
Make no mistake, the invalidation of the Silvicultural Rule is only one of the many sources of regulatory uncertainty facing our professional loggers.
I have been a part of a group of people that have worked on this bill. Primarily my friend from Massachusetts (Mr. Delahunt) and I some 5 years ago started working on this bill. This is a very good bill. I urge Members to support the rule…
I thank the chairman. Mr. Chairman, this is Washington, so we have to have an acronym for everything up here. The IPAB isn't a new techie device but is an example of one of the many misguided parts of the budget-busting health care reform…





