I would like to clarify the actual wording of what this bill does. It does not favor or disfavor any particular result or any group of people. It is motivated by a desire to preserve for the States the authority to decide whether the shield Congress enacted to protect them from having to accept same sex marriage licenses issued out of State will hold. There is no ill will here toward anyone. It does not dictate the results, either. It only places final authority over whether the States must accept same sex marriage licenses granted in other States in the hands of the States themselves. This bill should be supported, I believe, by any Member who supports the proposition that lifetime appointed Federal judges must not be allowed to rewrite marriage policies for the States.
Sue Myrick: “I would like to clarify the actual wording of what this bill does. It does not favor or disfavor any particular result…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying the intent and implications of a bill regarding same-sex marriage licenses during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Sue Myrick
I don't think it should be in a position of withholding or removing approval of drugs that treat fatal illnesses.
this amendment unfairly penalizes consumers in States like North Carolina, where investor-owned utilities provide a majority of the State's power using coal-fired generation and nuclear power, and it also undermines the State's Renewable…
I am confident that the committee will get to the bottom of this in the future because we want to find out exactly what went on and how this loan guarantee was handled.
we've lost another great American who always put others before herself. She was devoted to her husband, Chuck, her two boys, Charlie and Chris, and her granddaughter, Charlotte, as well as all of the people she served. She and I were close…





