I would like to clarify the actual wording of what this bill does. It does not favor or disfavor any particular result or any group of people. It is motivated by a desire to preserve for the States the authority to decide whether the shield Congress enacted to protect them from having to accept same sex marriage licenses issued out of State will hold. There is no ill will here toward anyone. It does not dictate the results, either. It only places final authority over whether the States must accept same sex marriage licenses granted in other States in the hands of the States themselves. This bill should be supported, I believe, by any Member who supports the proposition that lifetime appointed Federal judges must not be allowed to rewrite marriage policies for the States.
Sue Myrick: “I would like to clarify the actual wording of what this bill does. It does not favor or disfavor any particular result…”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying the intent and implications of a bill regarding same-sex marriage licenses during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Sue Myrick
We've lost another great American who always put others before herself. She was devoted to her husband, Chuck, her two boys, Charlie and Chris, and her granddaughter, Charlotte, as well as all of the people she served. She and I were close…
I am confident that the committee will get to the bottom of this in the future because we want to find out exactly what went on and how this loan guarantee was handled.
It is obviously political season, and when it is politically convenient, deficits are a huge problem on the other side of the aisle, but they are not willing to make any sacrifices in any other areas to be fiscally responsible to all of…
When the lives of Americans are threatened on our very own border why would not a task force--a true task force to look into this--be created?





