As a member of the committee now for 6 years, I want to say a special word of thanks to the chairman of the committee, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Goss). This will be the last bill that he will present to the House of Representatives, as he is retiring from the House at the end of this year. It is a great, great loss for the House of Representatives. I know it is a great loss for the people of Florida, who he represents, and it truly is a great loss for the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the intelligence community. As someone who served in the CIA prior to coming to the House of Representatives, he has done as good a job as anyone on the committee, and certainly been an exemplary Chair of the committee. We all owe him a great debt of gratitude for the time and energy and devotion that he has given to the intelligence community, to the CIA, to people, men and women, all over the world who work so hard to collect the information and do the good professional work. He has been dedicated to them, he has been dedicated for them. And so I say congratulations to Porter Goss, and I think all House Members should do that for the work that he has done for the House and for the intelligence community.
Sue Myrick: “As a member of the committee now for 6 years, I want to say a special word of thanks to the chairman of the committee…”
Editor's note · Context
Paying tribute to retiring Chairman Porter Goss during House floor debate.
Share
More from Sue Myrick
First, like other Members today, I want to express my gratitude and thanks to Chairman Rogers and Ranking Member Ruppersberger for all of the work that they've done, just the incredible bipartisan working relationship that they've…
I have an amendment at the desk. The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: After section 501 (page 21, after line 14), insert the following new section: SEC. 502. PROTECTING THE INFORMATION…
Make no mistake, the invalidation of the Silvicultural Rule is only one of the many sources of regulatory uncertainty facing our professional loggers.
Like my colleague, Mr. McHenry, I also am rising because I do oppose this amendment, saying that the Department of Defense has to limit what they do and decide how they can recruit. And mainly, it's micromanaging. The biggest issue here is…





