I rise in support of S. 191. This is Senator Jesse Helms' companion to my H.R. 424, which passed the House on February 24 by an overwhelming vote of 350-to-589. As written, the Federal Criminal Code imposes a 5-year mandatory sentence when a felon uses or carries a firearm during the Commission of a violent crime or a drug trafficking offense. In the 1995 case of Bailey v. United States, though, the Supreme Court interpreted the word ``carry'' in the Federal criminal code to mean that a felon must fire or brandish his weapon. This is clearly contrary to Congress's intent, and it has resulted in the early release of hundreds of dangerous criminals. To put a stop to this mess, S. 191 clarifies that a criminal who possesses a gun while committing a violent crime or a drug crime will face a mandatory sentence. And at the same time, the bill increases the mandatory sentence for such crimes. Mr. Speaker, I am a strong defender of the second amendment, but no American has a right to go out and use a gun to commit a crime. Indeed, the National Rifle Association has endorsed S. 191 because they recognize the best way to protect our second amendment rights is to punish those who use their guns to rape or murder or traffic in drugs.
Sue Myrick: “I rise in support of S. 191. This is Senator Jesse Helms' companion to my H.R. 424, which passed the House on February…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for S. 191, a bill clarifying firearm sentencing for violent crimes.
Share
More from Sue Myrick
Mr. Speaker, the American people get it. They understand Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need to be reformed. The Federal Government has spent, as you have heard over and over, $145 billion in taxpayer dollars to prop up these two government…
First, like other Members today, I want to express my gratitude and thanks to Chairman Rogers and Ranking Member Ruppersberger for all of the work that they've done, just the incredible bipartisan working relationship that they've…
Well, it's my honor to be here. And I thank you for yielding me the time. As you said, we have a lot of colleagues here, and most of us share the same ideas relative to what we're about. You mentioned and are talking there about the dinner…
this amendment unfairly penalizes consumers in States like North Carolina, where investor-owned utilities provide a majority of the State's power using coal-fired generation and nuclear power, and it also undermines the State's Renewable…





