Personally, I do not think that it is fair to apply a consumer provision to one small group of banks. If something is a good idea in terms of consumer provisions, it ought to be applied to all banks. Personally, I see this legislation as in the interest of consumers. This is a branch opening bill. This will provide more services to the American people. So when we are talking about doing something that will limit interstate branching, I personally do not think that it is in the public interest.
Stephen Neal: “Personally, I do not think that it is fair to apply a consumer provision to one small group of banks. If something is a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing consumer provisions in banking legislation.
Share
More from Stephen Neal
I just want to point out that the bill, H.R. 3841, already contains many important consumer provisions. It preserves State branching, consumer protection, fair lending, and community reinvestment laws as they apply to interstate branches…
H.R. 3235 is an important legislative step forward in fighting the crime of money laundering. I am pleased to have cosponsored this legislation with the distinguished chairman of the Banking Committee, who has played a leading role in…
Mr. Speaker, I just want to respond to the comments by the gentleman from Nevada [Mr. Bilbray] and thank him for his concern. He is a very dedicated Member of Congress, always looking out for the interest of his State, and I appreciate his…
I would point out there are a number of important consumer protections for less-advantaged people in the bill. There is a number of consumer benefits for all Americans in the bill; there is a number of benefits for business in the bill…





